PCR testing is an extremely valuable tool in clinical medicine. Just about all acute leukaemia's are classified as to type using PCR tests, and many other blood disorders too. I worked for nearly 40 years in Pathology, specifically Haematology and blood transfusion science

A PCR test is neither a suitable means of diagnosis, nor is the PCR test useful in clinical medicine and has therefore never been approved for this purpose.

Steven Jeff - read this

The good for nothing vaccine

6 month observational study on BNT vaccine
In a randomized vaccination study on the safety and effectiveness of the BionTech BNT162b2 Corona vaccine, over 44,000 participants from Argentina, Brazil, Germany, South Africa, Turkey and USA were selected.
at the age of 16 years and over.
As a result, there were 16 deaths in the vaccinated group and 15 deaths in the placebo group.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159

Oh ya, I see you are still giving out incorrect information. See below from Facts Check:

An alert from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in America announcing that it will withdraw the request for emergency authorisation of a PCR test has been widely shared on social media in the UK, and claimed to be evidence that the tests have “failed their full review”, and that PCR tests are “meaningless”, “fraudulent”, “not fit for purpose”, or unable to distinguish between influenza and Covid-19. This is not true.

A CDC spokesperson told Full Fact that the PCR test in question—the CDC Novel Coronavirus (2019 nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR—is “a highly accurate test” and the decision to discontinue the request for emergency use authorisation was not due to performance issues.

So we're those 977 tested with the PCR test that the CDC says has to be stopped by the end of the year because they give 90 % false postives?